The quality of the outcomes.

Since this examination didn’t test the whole populace, there ought to be an estimation of mistake. The recipe for the safety buffer is: 1/√n.

For this examination with Among Undergraduate Female Students at a Selected College of Lalitpur, Nepal, the room for mistakes is about 7.5%.

This is useful in deciding the legitimacy or the quality of the outcomes.

Right now, creators noticed that causation couldn’t be derived because of the way that it was a cross-sectional examination. Additionally, they noticed that the example may not be illustrative of all road youth in Nepal, just a bit of them. The creators additionally noticed that, they didn’t study the members about their explanations behind not owning the bring home pack, or if the members who owned the units really hauled them around with them.

It’s impossible that one investigation would significantly change what is as of now thought about the point. A significantly extraordinary end could demonstrate concealed predisposition and propose misrepresented outcomes.

My own exploration didn’t uncover any investigations like this one. Of note, the creators additionally noticed that, as far as anyone is concerned, this was the primary investigation of its sort.

References

Feldman, J. Journalist’s Resource (2015). Eight questions to ask when interpreting academic studies: A primer for media. Retrieved from https://journalistsresource.org/tip-sheets/research/interpreting-academic-studies-primer-media/

Julia Goldman-Hasbun, Kora DeBeck, Jane A. Buxton, Ekaterina Nosova, Evan Wood, & Thomas Kerr. (2017). Knowledge and possession of take-home naloxone kits among street-

Effect of antiplatelet therapy – aspirin  and dipyridamole versus clopidogrel on mortality outcome in ischemic

stroke

1) What are the risks of bleeding and death from antiplatelet therapy?

Stroke is a devastating disease, causing significant mortality and long-term disability worldwide. Since the bulk of ischemic strokes is attributed to atherothrombosis, secondary prevention with antiplatelet agents is essential to decrease the recurrence of stroke. Aspirin, as well as clopidogrel monotherapy, has been shown to reduce the relative risk of recurrent stroke. However, concerns regarding the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet approach still exist. Stroke patients are particularly susceptible to bleeding complications, and other co-morbidities (Awada et al., 2019).

2) How is compliance with the medication monitored?

Persistence with antiplatelet medication within a cohort of hospitalized ischemic stroke patients was associated with a 72.5% lower likelihood of recurrent hospitalized stroke. Higher medication copayment was found to negatively impact patient persistence with antiplatelet therapy (Burke et al., 2010).

3) What are the other methods used to prevent the recurrence of ischemic stroke?

Use of statins, smoking cessation, dietary interventions, weight control, regular exercise,  and identifying and treating atrial fibrillation are some of the prevention methods that can be adopted by people in the prevention and recurrence of stroke.

References

Awada, Z., Abboud, R., & Nasr, S. (2019, June 19). Risk of Serious Bleeding with Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Prevention Post Ischemic Stroke in Middle East Population. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697456/

Burke, J. P., Sander, S., Shah, H., Zarotsky, V., & Henk, H. (2010, May). Impact of persistence with antiplatelet therapy on recurrent ischemic stroke and predictors of non-persistence among ischemic stroke survivors. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20199138

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

WhatsApp Chat with us on WhatsApp